Home Sections Opinion Geopolitical and domestic challenges for Sri Lanka in 2026
Opinion

Geopolitical and domestic challenges for Sri Lanka in 2026

Share
Share

By Veeragathy Thanabalasingham

The people of Sri Lanka have entered the new year in a precarious situation, facing enormous challenges in rebuilding the country from the ravages of Cyclone Ditwah. The cyclone stalled the progress made in the restructuring programme to stabilise the economy after the worst economic downturn in the country’s history in 2022.

The National People’s Power (NPP) Government led by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD), which came to power amidst great expectations, has passed through the first year of its term but faces a formidable task as a result of the natural disaster.

The Ditwah fallout

The failure to take the necessary precautionary measures to mitigate the effects of the cyclone in advance despite warnings and the flaws in post-disaster relief and reconstruction activities have been pointed out by Opposition parties. They attribute the flaws to the inexperience and incompetence of the leaders of the NPP in governance.

However, it is unfortunate that Sri Lanka is deeply rooted in a disgusting culture in which political forces do not come forward with a sense of responsibility to rebuild the country through an inclusive approach during national calamities, but only pick holes instead.

When former President Ranil Wickremesinghe was arrested in August 2025, Opposition politicians were talking about the urgency of working together against the Government’s alleged vindictiveness, but they were unable to put forward credible allegations against the regime which would have been acceptable to the people. Similarly, they once again wrongly believed that the crisis resulting from the cyclone could be used as an opportunity to turn the people against the Government.

At the same time, it must be pointed out that the Government is not keen in taking forward the work of rescuing people from disaster by involving all parties. The Presidential Task Force appointed to carry forward the work of rebuilding the country clearly exposes the serious flaw in the Government’s approach. There has been criticism from civil society organisations that not all non-governmental members of the task force are known to have experience or expertise in disaster management or in dealing with the needs of affected populations.

Despite being a Left-wing coalition, the NPP Government is very cautious in its interactions with civil society organisations. It is only after various criticisms that the Government came forward to include at least one representative from civil society in the Presidential Task Force.

Balancing India and China

The NPP is not prepared to learn any lesson from the miseries that the country has suffered as a result of past ways of governance that systematically ignored the participation of a wide range of stakeholders in the policy-making process, especially ethnic and religious minority communities.

But the NPP Government has been very prudent in ensuring that it does not face crises similar to those that had arisen as a result of the approaches adopted by previous governments in dealing with the international community. It maintains a balanced relationship between the Western powers and the powerful countries of Asia. 

The disaster munificence of countries from the East and West, like India, China, Pakistan, the US, and Japan, in response to the devastation caused by unprecedented flooding and landslides, is a testament to this.

In particular, the Government handles relations with India and China very tactfully. Given the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna’s (JVP) longstanding close political ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its virulent anti-India stance of the past, it was widely anticipated that relations with Beijing under its leadership would be a source of irritation for New Delhi.

However, President Dissanayake’s Government has been maintaining very close ties with India, defying all expectations. During the tenure of President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar described the relationship between India and Sri Lanka as “irreversible excellence”. It appears that President Dissanayake has reaffirmed it. 

The rush of powerful countries to provide humanitarian assistance and rescue missions to Sri Lanka can be said to be an indirect ‘showcase’ of geopolitical interest in the Indian Ocean. There is no gainsaying that providing disaster relief assistance is not only a goodwill gesture but also diplomacy in motion. Powerful nations use the opportunity to provide relief aid to strengthen ties with Colombo.

As the first responder to disasters in Sri Lanka, India has shown a special interest this time too. Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar arrived in Colombo on 22 December 2025 as a Special Envoy of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and announced a package of assistance for the rebuilding of Sri Lanka.

In his letter to President Dissanayake, Modi said: “Sri Lanka will always find India by its side.” Dissanayake, in a subsequent statement, hailed “a new era in Indo-Sri Lanka relations”.

On the heels of Jaishankar’s return to New Delhi, a high-profile delegation from China led by Wang Junzheng, a member of the 20th Central Committee of the CCP, arrived in Sri Lanka and held wide-ranging talks with Sri Lankan leaders. Overall, the powerful nations seized the opportunity to reassert their influence in a strategically contested region. It is reported that Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will also arrive in Sri Lanka on an official visit this week. 

A complex issue

It is important that countries at risk of frequent natural disasters as a result of climate change, such as Sri Lanka, maintain good relations with all countries, particularly with the world powers. But as Sri Lanka’s foreign aid dependency increases, the chances of the country becoming a playground for heightened geopolitical activity is likely to increase. 

Maintaining a balance in relations with important countries while receiving aid is a complex issue. 

Sri Lanka, which is already dependent on the international community to recover from the economic crisis, may not be able to avoid being caught up in the geopolitical interests of the superpowers, as it has to rely on foreign aid to recover from the ravages of nature’s fury. Only time will tell whether President Dissanayake and his Government will be able to maintain the balance in relations with those countries that they have achieved so far.

In the meantime, another vital question arises as to whether there will be enough time for the Government to focus on bringing political reforms as promised to the countrymen.

(The writer is a senior journalist based in Colombo)

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the official position of this publication.

Author

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
Opinion

No courage, no convictions… no confidence!

By Kusum Wijetilleke It is necessary to submit that the Minister of...

Opinion

Old wine in a new bottle

By Vox Civis The Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA),...

Opinion

Why spend on expressways and railways into the central region?

By Rohan Samarajiva The President floated the idea of no new construction...

Opinion

Legacy of failed terror laws: Lessons for Sri Lanka

By Lionel Bopage When I recently criticized Sri Lanka’s proposed Prevention of...