Home Sections Opinion India and Sri Lankan Tamil political parties
Opinion

India and Sri Lankan Tamil political parties

Share
Share

By Veeragathy Thanabalasingham

Once again, Sri Lankan Tamil political parties met Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar recently at India House in Colombo and requested him to exert pressure on the Sri Lankan Government to hold elections to the Provincial Councils (PCs) and fully implement the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

Jaishankar arrived in Colombo on the evening of 22 December 2025 on a day-long visit as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Special Envoy to announce India’s assistance for Sri Lanka’s recovery from the devastation caused by Cyclone Ditwah the previous month.

Leaders of the Ilankai Tamil Arasu Katchi (ITAK), Democratic Tamil National Alliance (DTNA), and Tamil National People’s Front (TNPF) had a joint meeting with Jaishankar on 23 December.

A different approach

It was a different approach this time. Despite their differences, Tamil politicians now seem to think that they need to have at least some understanding among themselves when talking to foreign leaders and diplomats about the problems of Tamils. They had consulted each other before the meeting with Jaishankar.

The leaders discussed relief and reconstruction work to be carried out for the people affected by the natural disaster in the north and east. They also pointed out to Jaishankar that it would have been much easier to provide relief and carry out reconstruction activities for the cyclone-affected people if the PCs had been in place.

TNPF Leader Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam, who has traditionally shown no interest in the PC system, has also told Jaishankar that PC Elections need to be held. He cut short his meetings with leaders of Tamil Nadu political parties in Chennai and hurried back to Colombo for the meeting with Jaishankar.

While stressing the need to have the PC Elections, Ponnambalam sought to differentiate himself from other politicians by pointing out that devolution within a unitary state was not possible in Sri Lanka and that only a federal system could solve the ethnic problem.

Not to be outdone, ITAK President C.V.K. Sivagnanam promptly stated that they too were of the firm view that federalism was the only viable political solution to the problem, noting that they were concerned not with the label of federalism but with the content of the powers to be shared.

Ponnambalam told journalists that he did not know about the contents of the letter to Prime Minister Modi, handed over to Jaishankar by ITAK and DTNA leaders jointly. It is reliably learnt that the letter included a request to prevail upon the Sri Lankan Government to hold PC Elections at the earliest but made no mention of a federal solution.

Jaishankar’s response

It is important to note that Sri Lankan Tamil parties’ insistence on PC Elections or their stance on federalism is not new to Jaishankar. He has had several talks with them not only as the Minister of External Affairs, but also during his earlier stint as Foreign Secretary.

When Eelam People’s Revolutionary Liberation Front (EPRLF) Leader Suresh K. Premachandran brought up the issue of the merger of the Northern and Eastern Provinces at a meeting in Colombo when Jaishankar was the Foreign Secretary several years back, the latter retorted that much water had flown under the bridge since the 1987 July Indo-Sri Lankan Peace Accord and that India was not in a position to talk to Colombo about the merger of the two provinces again.

In a meeting with leaders of Tamil parties including the late Rajavarothayam Sampanthan in Colombo after becoming the Minister of External Affairs, Jaishankar questioned how one could make a federal claim to Sri Lankan governments that had not implemented even the 13th Amendment for more than three decades.

Jaishankar did not say anything about federalism at the recent meeting. It is understood that the Indian Minister did not give a direct answer to the Tamil leaders’ request that India urge Colombo to hold PC Elections at the earliest.
Instead, he is understood to have asked questions aimed at eliciting the views of Tamil leaders on how the PC Elections could be conducted under the current situation. Only then had they brought to his notice the importance of PCs for relief and reconstruction work.

A leader who attended the meeting said Jaishankar was not responding to requests from them in order impress upon Tilvin Silva, the powerful General Secretary of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), the flagship party of the National People’s Power (NPP), the imperative to protect the PC system and hold early PC Elections. Silva is scheduled to visit New Delhi.

Paying a heavy price

In the 38 years since the signing of the Peace Accord, India has not been able to bring Sri Lanka on track to fully implement the 13th Amendment. The Modi Government cannot be expected to exert any pressure on President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s Government on the ethnic issue in the context of a vastly changed geopolitical situation.

However, it can only be expected that India will continue to insist on the full implementation of the Constitution of Sri Lanka (purposely avoiding mentioning the 13th Amendment), along with the conducting of PC Elections. It cannot be expected that New Delhi will ask a government that is seriously focused on rebuilding the country from the ravages of a natural disaster to hold elections anytime soon.

Meanwhile, ITAK General Secretary M.A. Sumanthiran said before the cyclone that a political movement would be launched from January to demand that the Government hold PC Elections. Interestingly, the NPP Government, which is not keen on holding PC Elections, has found a convenient excuse in the devastation caused by the cyclone.

The Tamil parties have no option but to appeal to India. The Tamil National Council (TNC), led by Ponnambalam, has sought the help of political parties in Tamil Nadu to press the Indian Central Government to encourage President Dissanayake’s Government to introduce a federal solution through a new constitution.

Some observers see this as an attempt to bring the Sri Lankan Tamil issue back into focus in the campaign for Legislative Assembly Elections in Tamil Nadu, which are still four months away.

On the whole, the strategy of the Tamil parties is to seek India’s favour to win the Tamil people’s demands, from holding PC Elections to finding a political solution based on federalism.

The former Tamil leaders who put forward the demand for federalism did not have a roadmap to achieve it. Similarly, today’s leaders are also merely talking about a solution based on a federal system but have no plan to realise it.

It is necessary for the Tamil parties to have a clear understanding of the major mistake committed by the Tamil side in dealing with India in the post-Peace Accord period and the primary forces responsible for it.

There is no gainsaying that the Tamil side is also no less responsible for today’s deterioration of the PC system.

The Sri Lankan Tamil community is paying a heavy price for having justified the horrendous mistakes of the past without forethought of the consequences.

(The writer is a senior journalist based in Colombo)

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the official position of this publication.

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
Opinion

Unfolding crisis and path to restoration

By Lionel Bopage A Fading Green Heart Sri Lanka in 1881 was...

Opinion

Natural disaster prevention requires policy changes

By Prof. Tissa Vitarana The biggest danger and challenge we face is...

Opinion

Why the PSTA must be debated and changed

By Dr. Jehan Perera A prominent feature of the first year of...

Opinion

Bouquets outnumber brickbats in AKD’s performance  

By Col R Hariharan The year 2025 will be remembered in Sri...