Home News Feature Court rejects GR’s bid to block arrest over Easter Sunday probe
News Feature

Court rejects GR’s bid to block arrest over Easter Sunday probe

Share
Share

By The Pulseline News Desk

The Court of Appeal has dismissed, without proceeding to a full hearing, a writ petition filed by former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa (GR) seeking to prevent his arrest or detention under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) in connection with investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks.

GR had asked the court to issue an order preventing the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) from arresting or detaining him as part of the ongoing investigations into the April 21, 2019 attacks.

The petition named the Inspector General of Police, CID Director Shani Abeysekera, the officer in charge of the CID’s Special Investigations Unit and the Attorney General as respondents.

The case had attracted attention because it sought judicial protection against possible arrest while investigations into one of Sri Lanka’s most serious post-war security incidents continue.

The Court of Appeal had previously heard submissions from lawyers representing both GR and the respondents before reserving its decision on whether the petition could proceed.

GR had also sought interim protection against arrest pending the determination of his petition.

During the earlier proceedings, however, the Attorney General’s Department has informed court that it could not give an undertaking that GR would not be arrested without first obtaining instructions from the relevant respondents.

The dismissal now leaves the former President without the interim protection he had sought through the writ proceedings.

The development comes as the CID continues its investigations into the Easter Sunday attacks, which killed more than 250 people and injured hundreds in coordinated bombings targeting churches and hotels.

The investigations remain ongoing, with questions surrounding the attacks, the intelligence failures that preceded them and the subsequent handling of the investigations continuing to generate political and legal scrutiny.

For GR, the dismissal removes a legal avenue he had pursued to obtain advance protection from arrest under the PTA. For investigators, the development leaves open the possibility of further investigative or legal action, subject to the applicable law and decisions by the relevant authoritie

Author

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
News Feature

JVP-BJP engagement reaches higher level as Tilvin meets Jaishankar in Delhi

By The Pulseline News Desk The Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna’s (JVP) five-day engagement...

News Feature

CIABOC’s focus on decade-old files puts Opposition figures under investigation spotlight

By The Pulseline News Desk A decade-old backlog of corruption investigations has...

News Feature

Siriliya Saviya probe: FCID gives Shiranthi a two-week window?

By The Pulseline News Desk The investigation into former First Lady Shiranthi...

News Feature

Rs. 41 billion fuel bailout as CPC faces Rs. 70 loss on every litre of diesel

By The Pulseline News Desk Sri Lanka’s fuel market is coming under...